Skip to content
House Market House

Advocacy Group Claims to Have Scraped Millions of Audio Tracks from Spotify

A digital rights organization has claimed to have harvested a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to release them publicly.

Potential Boost for Artificial Intelligence Development

Industry experts said the apparent leak could boost artificial intelligence firms looking for material to develop their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of associated data such as performer and album names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the breach did not constitute its full catalog.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a third party collected public metadata and employed illicit methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Archive's Declared Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not think the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They claimed the music files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a method of sharing large data files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ copyright, said the breached music would probably be used for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on pirated material is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is almost certain to end up training AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to a large online archive, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “create their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. He added it could also enable technology firms to “educate models on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a battleground between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Considerations and Responses

In the UK, creative professionals have protested against a government proposal to allow AI companies use copyright-protected work without permission unless the rights holder signals. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for technology, research and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.

The writer

Sarah Hernandez

Elena is a real estate analyst with a passion for helping people navigate property markets.

House Market House

Type to search articles.